Syntax Index Insights: Second Quarter 2020
Highlights
- Unprecedented stimulus helps boost asset prices in Q2, but Coronavirus concerns linger
- Broad-based recovery in all equity benchmarks following sell-off in Q1 sees diversified indices outperform cap weight in Q2
- Stratified SmallCap (+30.3%) and MidCap (+27.9%) have strongest quarter on record
- Resurgence in COVID-19 cases stalls industry reversals, but value opportunities remain
- Economic Breadth Indicator suggests demand for equities is robust
Investor appetite for equities returned in the second quarter as the Fed and the US government vowed to stimulate the economy and return order to financial markets. The Fed was the buyer of last resort for a wide range of corporate debt and increased its balance sheet to 32.6% of GDP by the end of June – more than double the 15.1% of GDP following its measures to stem the Financial Crisis at the end of 2008. Meanwhile employment and consumer confidence were helped by multi-trillion-dollar fiscal programs. The upshot was a dramatic rally in risk assets from lows on the 23rd of March. The S&P 500 had its strongest quarter since 1998 (+20.5%) and the S&P 600 (+21.9%) and S&P 400 (+24.1%) both had their strongest quarter on record.
Core Index Comparison: Stratified, Cap, and Equal Weight
n the face of record quarterly returns, Stratified Weight indices outperformed cap weight in Q2 2020. Marginal outperformance in the LargeCap universe (+0.2%), which was dominated by the continued strong performance of megacap tech stocks, was overshadowed by significantly higher relative returns in the MidCap (+3.8%), SmallCap (+8.3%), and SEADM (1.4%) indices.
Stratified Weight Captures a Higher Small Cap Premium in Q2
The outperformance of smaller stocks in Q2 was motivated by the switch into risk assets on trading days when investors showed less concern regarding the impact of the virus shutdown to smaller businesses. Clearly, after the weakness in Q1, demand for risk premia, especially small caps, is still healthy.
We caution that investors trying to capture the small cap premium often overlook the biases that are inherent to the index and highlight that cap-weighted investments in core small cap products typically carry a different blend of sector exposures than their LargeCap counterparts.
The S&P 400 and S&P 600 indices have remarkably similar sector bets. In both, Industrials and Financials comprise almost half of the index (>45%), by both number of companies and cap weight. Such sector bias challenges whether investors are efficiently capturing the small cap premium. The overweight sectors are not chosen due to an expectation that they will deliver superior performance; rather, the index is overweight these groups largely because they have more listed equities.
Sector Weights and Q2 Performance for S&P 400 and 600 (Cap Weight)
We show in our note “Diversify for the Upside, not just the Downside” that taking concentrated positions without skill usually detracts from performance. The odds of selecting the better performing sectors is outweighed by the odds of selecting poorer performers (due to the skewness of the distribution). This was indeed the case in Q2 2020 when there were 3 sectors with above average returns and 5 with below average. The two largest sector positions in the S&P 600, Industrials and Financials, were in sectors which underperformed the average.
In contrast, the Stratified SmallCap index, which holds the same stocks as the S&P 600, allocated weight equitably across the different sectors and industries. This diversified weighting approach ensures that at the index has at least some exposure to the best performing sectors, which can generate outperformance in environments like Q2.
By avoiding overallocating to Financials, and instead having balanced exposure to Consumer, IT and Food, the Stratified SmallCap and MidCap indices strongly outperformed their cap-weighted benchmarks this quarter.
Reversal stalls as virus lingers. Value opportunities remain
Hopes of a full-fledged reversal for the most virus-sensitive stocks were put on hold as the number of daily confirmed cases of COVID-19 hit new highs in the US and abroad. Though the death rate has not yet seen a commensurate rise, the trend was worrying enough to temper investor enthusiasm for risk assets towards the end of June and into July. As Q2 came to an end, the resurgence served as a headwind for risky assets such as small caps and virus-sensitive industries such as airlines, cruise ships and financials and favored the technology and healthcare sectors.
Volatility during a recovery is not unusual. During the Financial Crisis, it took roughly six months from the collapse of Lehman Brothers (on 15th Sep 2008) for the S&P 500 to trough (on the 10th March 2009). There were multiple false starts during that time as investor optimism came and went regarding the economic impact of the crisis.
As we wrote in our March report, “Sell-offs, Reversals and Business Risk,” there are many similarities between the COVID-19 sell-off and recovery and the 2008 Financial Crisis. One such similarity is seen by the performance of small caps (S&P 600) relative to large caps (S&P 500).
When investors become more optimistic regarding the economic impact of the virus, the S&P 600 outperforms the S&P 500 (i.e. the lines in the chart below are rising). However, as can be seen by the recent decline in the blue line, as investors become more worried, small caps underperform.
S&P 600 relative to S&P 500: Financials Crisis and Coronavirus Pandemic
The current volatility in relative performance is very similar to that seen during the Financial Crisis. When confidence finally returned, the S&P 600 outperformed the S&P 500 by over 12% for the six month period following March 10th, 2009. Though it may take some positive news regarding COVID-19 to drive movement, we note that the valuations for many traditional risk premia (value versus growth or small cap versus large cap) are already at attractive levels.
Stratified Weight indices typically carry more Small Cap and Value exposure than cap-weighted indices. As of the end of Q2, the Stratified LargeCap index is trading at a 26% Price / Book discount to the S&P 500 (2.5x vs 3.4x respectively). The two indices had traded in line with one another from 2010 through 2017 and then separated as the cap-weighted benchmark became increasingly overweight in high-multiple technology stocks.
Price / Book Ratio: Stratified LargeCap vs S&P 500
Economic Breadth Indicator
The summer lull in activity is a welcome reprieve for equity investors who have been trading at higher frequency than in recent years. The indiscrimant buying in Q2 saw almost every type of company recover from the widespread sell-off in Q1.
In Q1, everything except Telecom Rental, Security Software, Cloud Access Software and Internet Services companies fell. In Q2, everything recovered, except for two groups: Financial Conglomerates (Berkshire Hathaway and Loews) and Computer Companies (HP and Xerox). In other words, 98% of industries (level 5) had positive returns for the quarter. We say that the Business Breadth was 98% last quarter.
Business Breadth for the Stratified LargeCap index
We view Business Breadth as confirmation of positive demand for an equity index. When Business Breadth is high, index returns have historically been positive the following quarter.
Stratified LargeCap Index Next Quarter Returns by Business Breadth Decile
Since 1992, there were 10 quarters when breadth was above 90%, and the index rose 8 of these 10 times. At the same time, very low levels of Business Breadth (0-20%) is usually a contrarian signal that markets are overly pessimistic, as was the case in Q1 2020. Of course, these empirical observations are naturally anecdotal, though we do believe that they underscore the healthy appetite that investors have for the asset class even in light of the recent volatility.
Sector and Composite Performance
US LargeCap (S&P 500 universe)
US MidCap (S&P MidCap 400 universe)
US SmallCap (S&P SmallCap 600 universe)
International Developed (MSCI EAFE universe)